|
|
TREKCORE >
VOY >
EPISODES >
YEAR OF HELL PART II > Behind the Scenes
|
|
|
This episode achieved a Nielsen rating of 5.2
million homes, and an 8% share. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upon its first broadcast in Great Britain (on the
BBC), this episode was shown edited together with the first half
of its two-parter, forming a feature-length television movie,
although it was not intended to be viewed that way. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimately, Brannon Braga believed that certain
chances he and Joe Menosky had taken while writing this
episode's two-parter had paid off. Shortly after the duology
first aired in the US, Braga remarked, "We took some big chances
with that show, and I think it's really interesting." Braga
thought that a good example of the two-parter's quality was the
destruction of Voyager in this episode's conclusion.
"It's just filled with that kind of
sweeping drama," he enthused.
Braga also counted this episode's
two-parter as a highlight of the fourth season (along with
"The
Killing Game" and "The Killing Game, Part II" as well as
"Prey"), and opined that – in common with the two-parter
"The
Killing Game" – this episode's duology involved
"high concept
stories with an epic sweep, with big cinematic action sequences,
and all of the characters [having] something fun to do."
An element of the two-parter's
development that Braga felt was "unfortunate" was that he and
Menosky had chosen to make Tuvok blind. Braga explained that his
reasoning for disliking this element of the plot was "because of
the Geordi La Forge connection," referencing the fact that Tim
Russ had been temporarily considered to play the character of
Geordi La Forge on TNG. |
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Menosky thought that, due to the caliber of
actor he believed Kurtwood Smith to be, the
"Year of Hell" two-parter
"worked really, really well." In common with Brannon Braga,
Menosky was ultimately satisfied with this episode's ending,
despite having had initial feelings to the contrary. He opined,
"It got us a great climax, which is plowing the ship into the
weapon, and in some ways took the arc of destroying the ship to
its ultimate conclusion, and a very satisfying conclusion." |
|
|
|
|
|
Jeri Taylor was also highly satisfied, ultimately,
with the "Year of Hell" two-parter.
Citing it as a highlight of Star Trek:
Voyager's fourth season, Taylor counted it as an example of
"some of our more epic episodes [that] had
everything going for them."
Taylor
further enthused about the two-parter, "It had a lot of action,
a gigantic adventure, personal stakes, an intriguing villain and
a very science fiction-based premise. Those are the things we
love to get." |
|
|
|
|
|
This episode's ending was controversial among fans.
"Obviously
we angered a lot of people with the ending," Joe Menosky
admitted. Remembering a particular manifestation of this fan
response, he stated, "I got one of the greatest little pieces of
fan mail I've ever gotten, from a fan who said, 'Annorax is the
best Trek villain in all of Trek history.' Then he went on to
say in the same letter, 'I'm sorry to say that I'm not going to
be watching Voyager anymore,' because he was so incensed about
the ending, about the reset button." Of course, not all fan
response to the episode's conclusion was negative.
"I got a
really interesting fan letter from someone who just loved the
ending," Menosky also related. "Her take on it was that Janeway
made this big sacrifice, and everything was reset, and then both
of them were subtly changed, both the villain and the hero, both
Janeway and Annorax, even though neither of them knew and was
aware of that timeline. Somehow there was a hint that something
positive had changed. Janeway was just a little less arrogant,
for example, when the Krenim came on the viewscreen [....] For
this fan, there seemed to be this interesting sense of a
positive and a humanizing effect that the adventure had on both
Janeway and Annorax." |
|
|
|
|
|
This episode was nominated for an Emmy Award for
Outstanding Special Visual Effects for a Series. |
|
|
|
|
|
After leaving Star Trek, Ronald D. Moore used this
episode as an example of how he believed
Star Trek:
Voyager
should have proceeded all along but also implied that he was not
fond of the way in which this episode ends. |
|
|
|
|
|
Following his appearances in this episode and the
previous one, Kurtwood Smith considered the possibility of
returning to Voyager as Annorax. "As 'Year of Hell Part II'
ended," the actor said, "you saw Annorax with his wife, but the
camera also moves in to show you that he's designing something.
If it's that ship and he hasn't learned his lesson–who knows?–he
could be back again. If they come up with a story as good as
'Year of Hell,' count me in. I would love to do it."
However, the
writers were – or, at least, Joe Menosky was – admittedly unsure
what would become of Annorax, following this episode's final
scene. "Does he give up work, spend more time with his family,
and become more humanized? I don't know," Menosky conceded.
Perhaps as a result of this
uncertainty, this episode's two-parter constitutes the only Star
Trek production in which the character of Annorax features. |
|
|